A Theoretical view of Multiple Realities

  

            The proposition of multiple dimensions has long been a subject among theorists. The major issue that overshadows the concept of alternate realities is the lack of physical trace evidence. Dealing with an intangible subject as such however provides no physical matter that can be analysed and studied under controlled conditions (unless someone manages a  reconnaissance mission and returns with the appropriate tangible proof. Then again, who says that the laws of physics in another reality are   identical to our own?).

            Let’s say that these overlaying dimensions do exist. Would intelligence from a different reality have the same problematic factors? Do they also lack the physical evidence from our world to prove that we exist? And what is our interpretation of real? How do we define what is real and what is not?

            The experience of ‘real’ is a perception conceived by our consciousness of what we touch, taste, see, hear and smell in the    present – the ontology of consciousness. If these same  principles of ‘what is real’ apply in another reality, where the law of natural existence most likely differs to our own, then the definition of ‘real’ becomes a controversial term. What appears to be real (physical) to us may not be real to them, and vice versa. And thus the cliché ‘seeing is believing’ becomes redundant. Let’s take the narrow visual spectrum of the human eye as an example. This is known as the electromagnetic spectrum (radiation/energy that    travels along with a stream of  photons). This spectrum is often    described in frequencies and wavelengths. Alpha - Beta - Gamma rays, X-rays, Ultraviolet, Infrared,    Microwaves etc are all situated in different ranges within the spectrum. The visible spectrum is only a minute fraction of this range, which enables us to see on a very narrow band. Anything that emits radiation on a low or high frequency will be invisible (and inaudible if below 24Hz – infrasonic sound – or above 20kHz – ultrasonic sound).

               In another assessment, according to scientific studies, the human eye receives approximately 4-billion bits of information per second, yet the brain converts only 2 thousand of that into perceivable data. An incredible amount of information is therefore ‘lost in translation’. Events on a large scale may well be occurring around us right now, without anyone being consciously aware of them. However, there are those within our society who seem to hear and see more than the median human being. Is it possible that this ‘sixth sense’ is a result of the human brain converting more information into observable data – being consciously aware of a broader frequency? Even then, these privileged individuals must only be aware of a tiny pigment of a much larger picture.

               But what of the manifestation of apparitions and other visible phenomenon of non-existing (physically) entities? Because we are dealing with the possibility of multiple realities or multiverse, is it likely that we are misinterpreting what we are seeing?

               In countries rich in cultural and social history, people have reported seeing elements of the past as if viewing a movie clip of time. Such cases involve the sighting of cavaliers, phantom carriages,    marching regiments of a bygone era, etc. It is also noted that these alleged ‘phantoms’ seem unconscious of the terrified observers. What is more bizarre is the log of sightings of extinct animals such as thylacines, dinosaurs and large human-like    primates in geological locations they were once native to. It is easy to scoff at the proposition that these elements of a lost time still exist. Again, this comes into our perception of what is real. If we are a part of a multiple overlay of realities, like skins on an onion, is it unreasonable to suggest that past and future events exist in different phases in individual layers? If that were the case, then, if we were to somehow overcome the difference in physics, would time travel be a possibility?

               On the opposing scale of the abovementioned examples, there are sightings of highly evolved aerial technology (futuristic) that have been described as hologram like. Some of these reports are accompanied by accounts of anthropomorphic life forms that seem to be iridescent or again,     hologram like.

                 If there are layers of realities that are phased before and after the moment we consider as the ‘present’, would this explain the    sensations of déja vu? Is there a form of subconscious link between two or more dimensions?

                  In addition we have other phenomena to consider. These are the etheric entities (or astral entities) who seem to acknowledge our  existence in the ‘physical’ realm. They are the remaining consciousness of the physically departed. If we consider the concept of different realities, this ‘astral sphere’ would more than likely lay independent of those mentioned formerly.

                  If these realities exist on different levels of natural law as mentioned previously, then why is it that some are privy to visually observe certain phenomenal events? In other words, why does this convergence of two realities occur?

                  A convergence theory may seem far-fetched and be easily dismissed because of its unpredictable nature. It is a  phenomenon that appears at  random (or so we assume that to be the case) therefore it falls outside the law of prediction making any crucial experimental studies impossible. Giving any form of  fundamental explanation to the ingredients of such a convergence would only be hypothetical (a stab in the dark at best) thus ruling out the principles of prediction leaving little or no possible opportunity for examination.

                  I became curious in the probability of such an intersection when my team and I researched an old deserted facility for studying possible paranormal activities. On a few occasions, members of the team including myself became aware of disturbances in the hallway. Although boarder lining noticeable, these   disturbances (occasionally in waves or mild pulses) were translated as being a typical ‘buzzing’ of an active facility. When these pulses peaked we could hear an overpowering voice over others as if discussing some vital issue. Other than our small team one can rest assured that the building was  completely empty.

                  This ‘buzzing’ was more clearly evidential during a thunderstorm, which also intensified other paranormal phenomenon such as poltergeist activity. It is a theory that astral   beings are capable of  absorbing energy thus energising themselves in a charged environment (especially during a thunderstorm), much like ball lighting or other naturally  occurring plasma. Apparently this enhances the astral beings’ ability to interact with our environment.

                   In contrast to the astral entities and their behaviour in the above conditions, the convergence of another reality that displays events of the past is an added rarity and is not understood (hypothetically) as to why it may occur. There are, however, naturally occurring phenomena that may one day present a predictable link to the convergence theory.

                    Could phenomena such as naturally occurring wormholes distort the fabric of space to a point where a convergence of realities may be possible? How do these unstable acts of nature occur? The initial process of a wormhole begins in an   extreme squeezed vacuum state where energy density falls below zero.  According to scientific theories,  wormholes are then formed by negative energy. In general, the effect of negative energy bends the geometric fabric of space.

                      Could certain regions on our planet lend themselves to subterranean gravitational abnormalities that can produce regions of squeezed vacuum measured by negative energy within which naturally occurring wormholes may form? Could the intersection of geomagnetic field lines (or spurts of opposing field lines) or some natural manipulation contribute to spawn a rip in the boundary fabric of two realities? The convergence is like a black hole created by a collapsed star – we can see the effects but not the source.

If nothing else, this information offers an open view on the subject of multiple realities and the possibility of their existence. We shouldn’t be quick to take the view of positivism (describes that any process that relates to positive facts and affirmations of theories that predict observations through orthodox scientific methods is regarded as authentic knowledge but regards anything else as meaningless).

If we don’t see it, it doesn’t mean that it doesn’t exist.

We must be mindful that our limitations do not dominate our thoughts, for we tend to rule out possibilities beyond those limitations.